Restorative materials for direct coronal restoration of permanent posterior teeth: an overview of systematic reviews
An overview of systematic reviews found that bulk-fill and conventionally-layered resin composites showed similar failure rates, whilst evidence comparing amalgam to composites and other materials was limited or of low certainty, with few studies from general practice settings.
A plain-English summary of the study's own findings — we don't add our own claims or interpretation. Read the full paper for the complete methods and results, and apply your own clinical judgement.
Read the full study at the sourceRelated CPD from Vital Pulp
Once and for All: Does Flossing Prevent Caries?
What the evidence actually says — an honest, cited look at flossing, caries and gum health
The Recall — the month's most significant new dental research, summarised. Free.
Browse The Recall